RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

Fw: [Bug 103030] New - Exceeding 187.7 feet physical dimension on single axis causes lockups and seg violations

This discussion is connected to the gimp-user-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

1 of 1 message available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

Fw: [Bug 103030] New - Exceeding 187.7 feet physical dimension on single axis causes lockups and seg violations Kevin Myers 10 Jan 14:15
Kevin Myers
2003-01-10 14:15:03 UTC (over 21 years ago)

Fw: [Bug 103030] New - Exceeding 187.7 feet physical dimension on single axis causes lockups and seg violations

Just FYI and to finish out the thread...

----- Original Message ----- From:
To:
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 7:07 AM Subject: [Bug 103030] New - Exceeding 187.7 feet physical dimension on single axis causes lockups and seg violations

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103030

Summary: Exceeding 187.7 feet physical dimension on single axis causes lockups and seg violations Product: GIMP
Version: 1.2.4-pre2
OS: All
OS Details: definitely repeatable on Win 2K, believe also exists

on

all other platforms
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Resolution:
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: General
AssignedTo: bugs@gimp.org
ReportedBy: KevinMyers@austin.rr.com

I work with scanned document images that are very long (up to several hundred feet) and relatively narrow (roughly 6 to 12 inches). These are typically scanned at 200 to 400 dpi, resulting in files with up to 600M pixels, being around 2K pixels on the narrow axis and up to 300K pixels on the long axis. Images of these dimensions are extremely important in the oil and gas industry, and the GIMP is one of the very few public domain programs in existence that can even begin to work with them.

In the course of working with these images, I have run into a bug in the GIMP that seems to be triggered by exceeding a certain threshold in the physical size of the image. It is important to note that this limit is NOT a file size limitation nor a pixel count limit. By decreasing the image resolution, I can cause this problem to occur in relatively small image files with fairly low pixel counts, while by increasing the image resolution I can avoid the problem with much larger files sizes and pixel counts. The following simple test scenarios illustrate these problems. The results here are from using GIMP 1.2.4 under Win 2K on a machine with a 2GHz P4 and 1.5GB of RAM. However, it is my impression from email threads with several other folks that the same problems also occur under Linux and probably on other platforms as well.

1. Start the GIMP.

2. Select File->New from the menu.

3. Select Grayscale.

4. Enter each combination of Width, Height, and Resolution shown below, then hit ok and observe the results. Use the same resolution for both X and Y axes. My results are provided below. Similar problems (including lock ups, segmentation violations, application crashes, etc.) occur when attempting to load existing images with similar dimensions rather than creating new images from scratch.

Width Height Resolution Image Size pixels pixels pix per in kilobytes Result

2 2252 1 4 image appears quickly 2 2253 1 4 no image, no disk I/O, CPU at 100%

1000 225200 100 214800 image appears quickly 1000 225250 100 214800 no image, no disk I/O, CPU at 100%

1000 450450 200 429600 image appears after small delay 1000 450500 200 429600 no image, no disk I/O, CPU at 100%

1000 900950 400 859200 image appears after small delay 1000 901000 400 859300 no image, no disk I/O, CPU at 100%

Note that regardless of resolution, file size, or pixel count, problems occur when the physical length of a single axis exceeds approximately 187.7 feet.

Please don't hesitate to contact me if any of this needs further discussion or explanation. I would also be very interested in testing any fixes that are made available. Thanks!

s/KAM