RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled
  1. Chat
  2. Useful links
  3. Polls

Featured content

gimp-unstable-2.3.11

This discussion is connected to the gimp-developer-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

3 of 3 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.
gimp-unstable-2.3.11 Petr Gajdos 08 Mar 10:15
  gimp-unstable-2.3.11 Raphaël Quinet 08 Mar 11:16
   gimp-unstable-2.3.11 Petr Gajdos 08 Mar 11:41
Petr Gajdos
2007-03-08 10:15:53 UTC (about 17 years ago)

gimp-unstable-2.3.11

Hi,
I'm solving bug (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231161 ) in package gimp-unstable-2.3.11. There are modified elements 2 and 3 of 'values' array on lines 223 - 226 of file

plug-ins/winicon/main.c

But this doesn't agree with definition of 'values' parameter of function run(), line 154.

Is it OK to replace 2 by 4 in the definition of 'values' variable? Thanks.
Petr

Raphaël Quinet
2007-03-08 11:16:27 UTC (about 17 years ago)

gimp-unstable-2.3.11

On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:15:53 +0100, Petr Gajdos wrote:

Hi,
I'm solving bug (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231161 ) in package gimp-unstable-2.3.11. [...] Is it OK to replace 2 by 4 in the definition of 'values' variable?

Yes, of course this is OK. Thanks a lot for reporting this bug and for providing a patch. This is now fixed in SVN, revision 22070.

I am surprised that such a bug was able to hide in our code for several months without being noticed. Boo! for the developer who introduced it in the code! :-) No, I will not give any names - the culprit has already been identified and he pleaded guilty.

-Raphaël

Petr Gajdos
2007-03-08 11:41:31 UTC (about 17 years ago)

gimp-unstable-2.3.11

:-)

Raphaël Quinet píše v ?t 08. 03. 2007 v 11:16 +0100:

On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:15:53 +0100, Petr Gajdos wrote:

Hi,
I'm solving bug (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231161 ) in package gimp-unstable-2.3.11. [...] Is it OK to replace 2 by 4 in the definition of 'values' variable?

Yes, of course this is OK. Thanks a lot for reporting this bug and for providing a patch. This is now fixed in SVN, revision 22070.

I am surprised that such a bug was able to hide in our code for several months without being noticed. Boo! for the developer who introduced it in the code! :-) No, I will not give any names - the culprit has already been identified and he pleaded guilty.

-Raphaël