[piotrlg@sci.pam.szczecin.pl: Re: alpha vs. transparency / translucency]
Piotr, next time try replying to the list =)
----- Forwarded message from Piotr Legiecki -----
Envelope-to: diablo@localhost
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 05:42:27 -0500
From: Piotr Legiecki
To: Patrick McFarland
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] alpha vs. transparency / translucency
X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *18Oy8H-0001fW-00*pRRb2yo43eE*
Patrick McFarland wrote:
On 18-Dec-2002, Sven Neumann wrote:
suggests to replace the term "Alpha" in the GIMP user interface by the
terms Transparency and/or Translucency. This could need some
discussion here, that's why I'd like to point the fellowship of
gimp-developer to this report. Please keep the discussion on the list.
Once we've settled on a strategy for this, we might need a volunteer
to go through the source and do the changes. Sounds like a good
opportunity to browse the GIMP source and contribute, don't you think?
I say leave it alone. Alpha is the correct term here, transparency isnt.
That is correct. 'Alpha' is a term used not only in gimp. It is a well
known and established term in gfx world. Don't change it.
Piotr L.
----- End forwarded message -----