RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled
  1. Chat
  2. Useful links
  3. Polls

Featured content

Move to gObject introspection?

This discussion is connected to the gegl-developer-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

2 of 2 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.
Move to gObject introspection? Stuart Axon 18 Jul 07:39
  Move to gObject introspection? Martin Nordholts 18 Jul 17:40
Stuart Axon
2010-07-18 07:39:58 UTC (almost 15 years ago)

Move to gObject introspection?

Maybe using GObject introspection would be an easier way of doing the bindings for Gegl, as you only have to do it once to get bindings for quite a few languages.

S++

Martin Nordholts
2010-07-18 17:40:35 UTC (almost 15 years ago)

Move to gObject introspection?

On 07/18/2010 07:39 AM, Stuart Axon wrote:

Maybe using GObject introspection would be an easier way of doing the bindings for Gegl, as you only have to do it once to get bindings for quite a few languages.

We should definitely do that, yes. Right now GEGL has a bit of a custom documentation syntax, so we would probably have to adjust it a bit to be GObject introspection compatible. I haven't looked it up in detail though.

/ Martin