Gimp and image properties
This discussion is connected to the gimp-user-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.
This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.
Gimp and image properties | Glenn Hancock | 23 Aug 16:42 |
Gimp and image properties | Patrick Shanahan | 23 Aug 17:04 |
Gimp and image properties | Glenn Hancock | 23 Aug 17:12 |
Gimp and image properties | Patrick Shanahan | 23 Aug 17:48 |
Gimp and image properties | Carol Spears | 23 Aug 19:01 |
Gimp and image properties | khiraly | 24 Aug 02:53 |
Gimp and image properties | Michael Schumacher | 23 Aug 17:39 |
Gimp and image properties | rob.davenport@us.abb.com | 23 Aug 19:05 |
Gimp and image properties | Patrick Shanahan | 23 Aug 19:59 |
Gimp and image properties | William Skaggs | 23 Aug 21:39 |
Gimp and image properties | William Skaggs | 23 Aug 22:54 |
Gimp and image properties | Bob Long | 24 Aug 03:26 |
Gimp and image properties | Bob Long | 24 Aug 08:25 |
Gimp and image properties | Michael Schumacher | 24 Aug 09:13 |
Gimp and image properties
I have a photo's I took with my D70 Nikon that come in at 2000x3008 and 300dpi. When I open in photoshop I can see this information along with the camera settings when the picture was snapped.
1) Can Gimp provide the camera data that is stored in the jpeg?
2) Why does Gimp show the resolution as 72x72 when it was originally 300?
I am concerned that if I work with my photo's in gimp that I"m going to end up with a lower res jpeg which will mess everything up...
Thanks,
glenn
Gimp and image properties
* Glenn Hancock [08-23-04 09:42]:
I have a photo's I took with my D70 Nikon that come in at 2000x3008 and 300dpi. When I open in photoshop I can see this information along with the camera settings when the picture was snapped.
1) Can Gimp provide the camera data that is stored in the jpeg?
Yes, filters -> generic -> exif browser
2) Why does Gimp show the resolution as 72x72 when it was originally 300?
72x72 is the screen resolution your are viewing the image in, not the image resolution.
I am concerned that if I work with my photo's in gimp that I"m going to end up with a lower res jpeg which will mess everything up...
ONLY, if you specifically change it. You are safe :^)
Gimp and image properties
Thanks for the info, but I don't have filters / generic / exif browser menu.
Also, if gimp is going to show me the screen resolution which I already know instead of the true resolution of the image then how do I determine the true resolution? That seems some what worthless to show me the screen resolution when asking for image properties doesn't it?
Thanks,
glenn
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:04:16 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Glenn Hancock [08-23-04 09:42]:
I have a photo's I took with my D70 Nikon that come in at 2000x3008 and 300dpi. When I open in photoshop I can see this information along with the camera settings when the picture was snapped.
1) Can Gimp provide the camera data that is stored in the jpeg?
Yes, filters -> generic -> exif browser
2) Why does Gimp show the resolution as 72x72 when it was originally 300?
72x72 is the screen resolution your are viewing the image in, not the image resolution.
I am concerned that if I work with my photo's in gimp that I"m going to end up with a lower res jpeg which will mess everything up...
ONLY, if you specifically change it. You are safe :^) --
Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos
Gimp and image properties
Thanks for the info, but I don't have filters / generic / exif browser menu.
Maybe this is an additional plug-in - I don't have this either.
Also, if gimp is going to show me the screen resolution which I already know instead of the true resolution of the image then how do I determine the true resolution? That seems some what worthless to show me the screen resolution when asking for image properties doesn't it?
Is the resulution really set in the image file (some formats support this) or just in the EXIF data? You could try to use another tool, maybe identify from imagemagick, to check this.
HTH, Michael
Gimp and image properties
* Glenn Hancock [08-23-04 10:13]:
Thanks for the info, but I don't have filters / generic / exif browser menu.
on image,
drop-down menu
filters -> generic -> exif browser
Also, if gimp is going to show me the screen resolution which I already know instead of the true resolution of the image then how do I determine the true resolution? That seems some what worthless to show me the screen resolution when asking for image properties doesn't it?
again,
on image,
drop-down menu
view -> info window
(or , unless you have changed it)
PLEASE, trim your quotes
ps: You didn't say which version of the gimp you are using. The current version 2.xx is what I have cited. Version 1.xx displays the screen resolution in the info window and I guess you would have to obtain a plugin for viewing exif data (availibility unknown).
pss: metacam is available (google search). I have ver 1.1. It displays exif data from graphic images (doesn't work on oly raw).
Gimp and image properties
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 11:12:00AM -0400, Glenn Hancock wrote:
Thanks for the info, but I don't have filters / generic / exif browser menu.
Also, if gimp is going to show me the screen resolution which I already know instead of the true resolution of the image then how do I determine the true resolution? That seems some what worthless to show me the screen resolution when asking for image properties doesn't it?
you can make the original read only and never save an altered image on top of this. screens only show a certain number of pixels. those resolution numbers, since i figured them out, make little sense and whenever printing an image that gimp or any other graphics rendering computer app has touched -- the machine does what it will and is not dependent at all on those little numbers.
just never save over the original and relax.
carol
Gimp and image properties
I don't have filters / generic / exif browser menu.
Maybe this is an additional plug-in - I don't have this either.
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4153
It's not ported for the Windows version of Gimp that I could find (with my humble google-fu). It would be nice to have though.
Rob
Gimp and image properties
* rob.davenport@us.abb.com [08-23-04 12:27]:
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4153
It's not ported for the Windows version of Gimp that I could find (with my humble google-fu). It would be nice to have though.
NOTE: this is for Gimp 2.xx and will probably *not* work in 1.xxx which I believe the OP has.
Gimp and image properties
Item: The EXIF Browser plug-in is not distributed with GIMP. (It may be included in some packages, though.) It can be downloaded from the GIMP Plugin Registry, at
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4153
Item: A digital camera image does not really have a true "resolution". Assigning one of 300 dpi is simply arbitrary. A resolution only exists when an image is physically displayed, on a monitor or paper. The 300 dpi value is simply a recommendation of a resolution that will give a decent-looking result when used for printing the image.
Anyway, the main reason GIMP does not show you the resolution is because it is stored in the EXIF data, and GIMP does not currently read EXIF data, it simply passes it through unchanged.
Best, -- Bill
______________ ______________ ______________ ______________
Sent via the KillerWebMail system at primate.ucdavis.edu
Gimp and image properties
An update:
Thanks to Michael Schumacher I have been able to add a Windows binary for the EXIF browser plug-in to the Registry: exif-browser-bin.zip from
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4153
To install, just unzip it and place the unzipped version in the "plugins" subdirectory of your personal GIMP directory. Michael says this should work with GIMP 2.0.x.
Best, -- Bill
______________ ______________ ______________ ______________
Sent via the KillerWebMail system at primate.ucdavis.edu
Gimp and image properties
Hi!
1) Can Gimp provide the camera data that is stored in the jpeg?
Yes, filters -> generic -> exif browser
I think it would be better to place in a new tab of Image->Info Windows dialog. That would be more self-explanatory. And the plugin should be distributed with the standard gimp.
I think some plugins is are really usefull (and frequently searched), so I think it should be good to package with the standard gimp distribution. Or at least make a standard pluginset package.
Best regards, Khiraly
Gimp and image properties
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 6:54 AM [GMT+1=CET], William Skaggs wrote:
An update:
Thanks to Michael Schumacher I have been able to add a Windows binary for the EXIF browser plug-in to the Registry: exif-browser-bin.zip from
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4153
To install, just unzip it and place the unzipped version in the "plugins" subdirectory of your personal GIMP directory. Michael says this should work with GIMP 2.0.x.
Using 2.0.3 (on XP Home), the filter now appears, but there is the message, "Exif Browser Message This image has no exit data attached."
Using the EXIF info in IrfanView does show information. So I'm not sure what it all means!
Bob Long
Gimp and image properties
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 11:26 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Bob Long wrote:
[...]
exif-browser-bin.zip from
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4153
To install, just unzip it and place the unzipped version in the "plugins" subdirectory of your personal GIMP directory. Michael says this should work with GIMP 2.0.x.
Using 2.0.3 (on XP Home), the filter now appears, but there is the message, "Exif Browser Message This image has no exit data attached."
Just upgraded to the GIMP 2.0.4 (Windows) and the exif browser now works. Great stuff!
Bob Long
Gimp and image properties
Bob Long wrote:
Using 2.0.3 (on XP Home), the filter now appears, but there is the message, "Exif Browser Message This image has no exit data attached."
Just upgraded to the GIMP 2.0.4 (Windows) and the exif browser now works. Great stuff!
GIMP 2.0.3 had a glitch in the EXIF handling, this may be the problem: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148632
HTH, Michael