RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

colour management and profile

This discussion is connected to the gimp-user-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

3 of 3 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

colour management and profile bogolisk@gmail.com 05 Jan 19:02
  colour management and profile Sven Neumann 07 Jan 13:15
colour management and profile bogolisk@gmail.com 08 Jan 15:43
bogolisk@gmail.com
2007-01-05 19:02:00 UTC (over 17 years ago)

colour management and profile

Please help the newbie here!

How does one use the different profile options:

I have

- the samsung LCD monitor profile (.icm) file (not sure if it's usable by gimp)

- the Costco lab icc profile (.icc) file

Gimp ask me (in Edit->Preferences->Colour Management) for:

- RGB profile - CMKY profile
- Monitor profile
- Print simulation profile

Right now:

- I set gimp in "Print Simulation mode" - use the .icm file for Monitor profile (not sure it doesn't anything) - use the Costco lab icc profile for the other options (RGB profile, CMKY profile, Print simulation profile)

What are the correct settings?

Thanx

Sven Neumann
2007-01-07 13:15:12 UTC (over 17 years ago)

colour management and profile

Hi,

On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 13:02 -0500, bogolisk@gmail.com wrote:

What are the correct settings?

There are no correct settings as color management is not yet completely implemented. You better disable color management as you will only get wrong results with the current implementation.

Sven

bogolisk@gmail.com
2007-01-08 15:43:52 UTC (over 17 years ago)

colour management and profile

On 7 Jan 2007, sven@gimp.org wrote:

Hi,

On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 13:02 -0500, bogolisk@gmail.com wrote:

What are the correct settings?

There are no correct settings as color management is not yet completely implemented. You better disable color management as you will only get wrong results with the current implementation.

Hm, it seems to do a fair job most of the time, thought.

Sven