RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

DPI or resolution ?

This discussion is connected to the gimp-user-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

3 of 3 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

DPI or resolution ? Michael Schumacher 27 Jun 00:05
DPI or resolution ? Rikard Johnels 27 Jun 00:20
DPI or resolution ? Carol Spears 27 Jun 04:39
Michael Schumacher
2005-06-27 00:05:03 UTC (almost 19 years ago)

DPI or resolution ?

Richard Nagle wrote:

well, it would appear to me the more import ## is resolution, i.e. a image at 1600 x 1200 @ 144 dpi ( 8 x 10 ) approx would be a bad print, however scaling up to a 3200 x 2400 resolution image, would produce a nice 300 dpi print.

So, a chart, of resolution sizes, would be nice, for printing out photo¹s ..ie. 8x10 11x14 16x20...etc

Um, is this a reply or a question?

Michael

Rikard Johnels
2005-06-27 00:20:50 UTC (almost 19 years ago)

DPI or resolution ?

On Sunday 26 June 2005 23.52, Richard Nagle wrote:

well, it would appear to me the more import ## is resolution, i.e. a image at 1600 x 1200 @ 144 dpi ( 8 x 10 ) approx would be a bad print, however scaling up to a 3200 x 2400 resolution image, would produce a nice 300 dpi print.

So, a chart, of resolution sizes, would be nice, for printing out photo¹s ..ie. 8x10 11x14 16x20...etc

Richard _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

That depends on the viewing distance. A 10x15 cm print "needs" somewhere 300 dpi to be able to view it closely. A huge 10x15 metre billboard viewed from 10 m distance need maybe 30 dpi.

See for instance http://www.bigphotohelp.com/articles1.htm http://www.ltlimagery.com/resolution.html http://www.signindustry.com/outdoor/articles/2001-03-19-viewingDistance.php3

Carol Spears
2005-06-27 04:39:33 UTC (almost 19 years ago)

DPI or resolution ?

On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 08:13:13PM -0400, Richard Nagle wrote:

hmm,.
that interesting, trying printing that out on a C86... yikes.

Well, was wondering if there was a chart out there, for print resolution sizes.

it is simple mathematics ....

On Sunday 26 June 2005 23.52, Richard Nagle wrote:

well, it would appear to me the more import ## is resolution, i.e. a image at 1600 x 1200 @ 144 dpi ( 8 x 10 ) approx would be a bad print, however scaling up to a 3200 x 2400 resolution image, would produce a nice 300 dpi print.

So, a chart, of resolution sizes, would be nice, for printing out photo?s ..ie. 8x10 11x14 16x20...etc

your example is an example of the mathematics, for example. (dots = pixels)

1600 pixels
----------- = 11.11 inch
144 pixels
-----
inch

3200 pixels
---------- = 10.67 inch
300 pixels
-----
inch

my physics teachers insisted that you always use the units and when you perform the mathematical operations on the values that you also do the mathematical operations on the units as well. it is really handy for checking your work (especially with more complicated mathematical evaluations).

the problem with making a table with this information is that the different printing devices work differently and need different resolutions. the last time i was at a print shop, black and white printing only demanded 150 pixels/inch while the color printing needed 300 pixels/inch.

another thing i noticed, making photo prints, 200 pixels/inch made perfectly fine color prints.

carol