RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

unsharp mask and jpg with quality setting change

This discussion is connected to the gimp-user-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

4 of 4 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

unsharp mask and jpg with quality setting change Barton Bosch 02 Oct 23:07
  unsharp mask and jpg with quality setting change Carol Spears 03 Oct 00:28
   unsharp mask and jpg with quality setting change Barton Bosch 03 Oct 06:11
    unsharp mask and jpg with quality setting change Carol Spears 03 Oct 08:50
Barton Bosch
2004-10-02 23:07:43 UTC (over 19 years ago)

unsharp mask and jpg with quality setting change

I have some 1200 dpi scans that need to be scaled down, sharpened with unsharp mask and then saved as jpgs at ~50% quality setting.

Should the operations be performed in the order above or would it be better to scale->save as 50% qual jpg->unsharp mask->save as 100% qual jpg?

Thanks,

Barton

Carol Spears
2004-10-03 00:28:18 UTC (over 19 years ago)

unsharp mask and jpg with quality setting change

On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 02:07:43PM -0700, Barton Bosch wrote:

I have some 1200 dpi scans that need to be scaled down, sharpened with unsharp mask and then saved as jpgs at ~50% quality setting.

i am curious for the reason for saving at the 50% quality setting. fiddling with the quality setting is good to do if you are trying to improve the load speed of a web page and perhaps to save disc space if this is a problem.

i guess i would like to know what the purpose is for the image.

Should the operations be performed in the order above or would it be better to scale->save as 50% qual jpg->unsharp mask->save as 100% qual jpg?

saving should be only one step and the last step. the unsharp mask should be the second to the last step. if sharpening is necessary, it should be done on each size that you save. so in short:

1) scale 2) sharpen
3) save

carol

Barton Bosch
2004-10-03 06:11:25 UTC (over 19 years ago)

unsharp mask and jpg with quality setting change

Carol Spears wrote:

On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 02:07:43PM -0700, Barton Bosch wrote:

I have some 1200 dpi scans that need to be scaled down, sharpened with unsharp mask and then saved as jpgs at ~50% quality setting.

i am curious for the reason for saving at the 50% quality setting. fiddling with the quality setting is good to do if you are trying to improve the load speed of a web page and perhaps to save disc space if this is a problem.

i guess i would like to know what the purpose is for the image.

Yup, just trying to make the document a little lighter weight. The basic purpse of the doc is as a series of reference charts and tables that will be hyperlinked -- eliminating the need to repeatedly refer to the paper book that the scans were taken from.

Nothing especially exciting, but I am learning about different practices for high quality image manipulation in The GIMP.

Should the operations be performed in the order above or would it be better to scale->save as 50% qual jpg->unsharp mask->save as 100% qual jpg?

saving should be only one step and the last step. the unsharp mask should be the second to the last step. if sharpening is necessary, it should be done on each size that you save. so in short:

1) scale 2) sharpen
3) save

Ok, thanks.

Barton

Carol Spears
2004-10-03 08:50:22 UTC (over 19 years ago)

unsharp mask and jpg with quality setting change

On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 09:11:25PM -0700, Barton Bosch wrote:

Yup, just trying to make the document a little lighter weight. The basic purpse of the doc is as a series of reference charts and tables that will be hyperlinked -- eliminating the need to repeatedly refer to the paper book that the scans were taken from.

Nothing especially exciting, but I am learning about different practices for high quality image manipulation in The GIMP.

you might consider using indexed png's for this. jpgs are definately best for photographs but indexed pngs are very light weight and do not look that bad. to index an image Image -->Mode -->Indexed. this reduces the colors from billions of colors to 256 colors and is a very good way to handle many simpler images.

carol