RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

Possible source markup language changes

This discussion is connected to the gimp-docs-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

1 of 1 message available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

Possible source markup language changes Alexandre Prokoudine 30 May 22:39
Alexandre Prokoudine
2016-05-30 22:39:05 UTC (almost 8 years ago)

Possible source markup language changes

Hello,

One topic we've been discussing on #gimp lately is a possibility to move away from DocBook/XML to a different markup language that would be easier for contributors to handle, while retaining both the gettext workflow and existing translations.

Asciidoc is one possibility suggested by our Italian translator Marco Ciampa. We already use asciidoc in GEGL (in fact, gegl.org is built from asciidoc files), so one might say we have a bit of history with it :) Marco claims that gettext workflow is possible with asciidoc. Retaining existing PO files with translation is a subject for further investigation at this point.

We don't expect to make any bold infrastructure changes for v2.10, but v3.0 sounds like a good candidate for this milestone.

We appreciate your input on the subject. However we'd like to point that strong advocacy for any DocBook/XML replacement is best served with volunteering to maintain a new infrastructure :)

Alex