RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

<revision>

This discussion is connected to the gimp-docs-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

7 of 7 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

<revision> julien 10 Mar 23:33
  <revision> Sven Neumann 11 Mar 02:15
   <revision> julien 11 Mar 06:18
   <revision> Daniel Egger 11 Mar 07:18
  <revision> Axel Wernicke 11 Mar 02:20
   <revision> julien 11 Mar 06:13
    <revision> Axel Wernicke 12 Mar 06:43
julien
2006-03-10 23:33:35 UTC (about 18 years ago)

<revision>

I don't well understand
Should it be:
1/
$revision:$
...
...
...
...

with only one revnumber for the file, or
2/
$revision:$
...
...


$revision:$
...
...

with a revnumber for every language in the file?

julien

Sven Neumann
2006-03-11 02:15:19 UTC (about 18 years ago)

<revision>

Hi,

julien writes:

I don't well understand
Should it be:
1/
$revision:$
...
...
...
...

with only one revnumber for the file, or
2/
$revision:$
...
...


$revision:$
...
...

with a revnumber for every language in the file?

$revision$ refers to the CVS revision of the file and the value is inserted automatically. So a file can only have a single revision number, the first version should thus be sufficient.

Sven

PS: This will change somewhat next week when CVS is being migrated to Subversion. In a subversion repository there is only one revision number for the whole repository. Whether that is a problem or not, I don't know.

Axel Wernicke
2006-03-11 02:20:38 UTC (about 18 years ago)

<revision>

Hi,

Am 11.03.2006 um 08:33 schrieb julien:

I don't well understand
Should it be:
1/
$revision:$
...
...
...
...

with only one revnumber for the file, or
2/
$revision:$
...
...


$revision:$
...
...

with a revnumber for every language in the file?

The first version is simply not valid docbook xml. Thats why it can't be used.

lexa

julien

julien
2006-03-11 06:13:29 UTC (about 18 years ago)

<revision>

Are you sure?
"1/" was the example given by Roman and used in toolbox/intro.xml or tool-rect-select.xml for instance: working well.

Another way to ask my question: must we have only one revnumber for the file (and for all languages) or a revnumber for every language in the file?

Julien

Axel Wernicke a ?crit :

Hi,

Am 11.03.2006 um 08:33 schrieb julien:

I don't well understand
Should it be:
1/
$revision:$
...
...
...
...

with only one revnumber for the file, or
2/
$revision:$
...
...


$revision:$
...
...

with a revnumber for every language in the file?

The first version is simply not valid docbook xml. Thats why it can't be used.

lexa

julien

julien
2006-03-11 06:18:42 UTC (about 18 years ago)

<revision>

Sven's answer arrived while I was writing my own answer...

Julien

Sven Neumann a ?crit :

Hi,

julien writes:

I don't well understand
Should it be:
1/
$revision:$
...
...
...
...

with only one revnumber for the file, or
2/
$revision:$
...
...


$revision:$
...
...

with a revnumber for every language in the file?

$revision$ refers to the CVS revision of the file and the value is inserted automatically. So a file can only have a single revision number, the first version should thus be sufficient.

Sven

PS: This will change somewhat next week when CVS is being migrated to Subversion. In a subversion repository there is only one revision number for the whole repository. Whether that is a problem or not, I don't know.

Daniel Egger
2006-03-11 07:18:38 UTC (about 18 years ago)

<revision>

On 11.03.2006, at 11:15, Sven Neumann wrote:

PS: This will change somewhat next week when CVS is being migrated to Subversion. In a subversion repository there is only one revision number for the whole repository.

Yay! Way to go.

Whether that is a problem or not, I don't know.

Why would it?

Servus,
Daniel

-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : /lists/gimp-docs/attachments/20060311/f2bb57f6/PGP.bin

Axel Wernicke
2006-03-12 06:43:59 UTC (about 18 years ago)

<revision>

Hi Julien,

Am 11.03.2006 um 15:13 schrieb julien:

Are you sure?
"1/" was the example given by Roman and used in toolbox/intro.xml or tool-rect-select.xml for instance: working well.

not everything the build process does not complain about is valid docbook. Have a look at http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ revision.html to learn more about the element.

Another way to ask my question: must we have only one revnumber for the file (and for all languages) or a revnumber for every language in the file?

we do have more than on element for the revision number but get only one revision from cvs. Therefore the revision number is the same for all languages in one file/section.

Greetings,

lexA

btw. On which level do we do the revision tags anyway? One per sect1 and sect2 and sect3 or only the topmost of each file or ... ?

Julien

Axel Wernicke a ?crit :

Hi,
Am 11.03.2006 um 08:33 schrieb julien:

I don't well understand
Should it be:
1/
$revision:$
...
...
...
...

with only one revnumber for the file, or
2/
$revision:$
...
...


$revision:$
...
...

with a revnumber for every language in the file?

The first version is simply not valid docbook xml. Thats why it can't be used.
lexa

julien