RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

'critical error' running luminosity mask script

This discussion is connected to the gimp-user-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

12 of 12 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

'critical error' running luminosity mask script Casey Connor 20 Apr 20:35
  'critical error' running luminosity mask script Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list 20 Apr 21:05
   'critical error' running luminosity mask script Casey Connor 20 Apr 21:35
    'critical error' running luminosity mask script Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list 20 Apr 22:12
     'critical error' running luminosity mask script Casey Connor 20 Apr 22:44
      'critical error' running luminosity mask script Pat David 20 Apr 23:14
       'critical error' running luminosity mask script Casey Connor 21 Apr 17:50
      'critical error' running luminosity mask script rich404 21 Apr 15:12
       'critical error' running luminosity mask script Casey Connor 21 Apr 22:21
       'critical error' running luminosity mask script Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list 21 Apr 23:23
        'critical error' running luminosity mask script Casey Connor 22 Apr 04:51
         'critical error' running luminosity mask script Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list 22 Apr 20:29
Casey Connor
2018-04-20 20:35:40 UTC (almost 6 years ago)

'critical error' running luminosity mask script

Hi -- I just filed a bug (here
) for a 'critical
error' that happens for me with 2.10 RC1 (AppImage from here ).

I thought I'd write here in case anyone had any ideas for workarounds that I might try until the bug gets fixed. E.g. maybe there is something obviously deprecated that the script is doing? (I didn't write the script, but I modified it slightly.) It worked fine with 2.9.5. The script is attached at the bug report.

Thanks for any ideas!

-Casey

Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list
2018-04-20 21:05:39 UTC (almost 6 years ago)

'critical error' running luminosity mask script

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:35:40PM -0700, Casey Connor wrote:

Hi -- I just filed a bug (here
) for a 'critical error'
that happens for me with 2.10 RC1 (AppImage from here ).

I thought I'd write here in case anyone had any ideas for workarounds that I might try until the bug gets fixed. E.g. maybe there is something obviously deprecated that the script is doing? (I didn't write the script, but I modified it slightly.) It worked fine with 2.9.5. The script is attached at the bug report.

Thanks for any ideas!

-Casey

On 2.10.0-RC2 (with latest babl and gegl), running that script after starting the gimp from a term gives a series of failed assertions:

gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed

This does not crash, but obviously the script no-longer works.

Welcome to the script-fu console! And yes, things which worked in even 2.9.6 no-longer work. Happy lisping (if such a concept is possible), or else just "good luck with debugging it".

ĸen

This email was written using 100% recycled letters.
Casey Connor
2018-04-20 21:35:22 UTC (almost 6 years ago)

'critical error' running luminosity mask script

Thanks --

starting the gimp from a term gives a series of failed assertions

Hmmm, all I got in stdout was

*WARNING* missing babl fast path(s): "R'G'B'A u8" to "B' u8" *WARNING* missing babl fast path(s): "R'G'B'A u8" to "A u8"

...but anyway yeah I saw those failed assertions in the debug dialog, too.

I don't find any quick ref guides to updating scripts to work with 2.10... any pointers to docs online re: what to look out for?

-c

gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed gimp: Gimp-Core-CRITICAL: gimp_channel_push_undo: assertion 'gimp_item_is_attached (GIMP_ITEM (channel))' failed

This does not crash, but obviously the script no-longer works.

Welcome to the script-fu console! And yes, things which worked in even 2.9.6 no-longer work. Happy lisping (if such a concept is possible), or else just "good luck with debugging it".

ĸen

Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list
2018-04-20 22:12:39 UTC (almost 6 years ago)

'critical error' running luminosity mask script

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 02:35:22PM -0700, Casey Connor wrote:

Thanks --

starting the gimp from a term gives a series of failed assertions

Hmmm, all I got in stdout was

*WARNING* missing babl fast path(s): "R'G'B'A u8" to "B' u8" *WARNING* missing babl fast path(s): "R'G'B'A u8" to "A u8"

...but anyway yeah I saw those failed assertions in the debug dialog, too.

I'll guess they are on stderr.

I don't find any quick ref guides to updating scripts to work with 2.10... any pointers to docs online re: what to look out for?

-c

You said you had edited the script - did you not use the script-fu console and its included help for that ? It's some months since I last had to do that, I'm rusty on the details.

And I doubt there will be any quick guides before 2.10 is released. Things change during development. For example, one script I used in 2.9.6 gave a lot of warnings - but in RC1 it appeared to work ok without producing any warnings.

More generally: everyone who uses external scripts will need to test them to see if they still work.

ĸen

This email was written using 100% recycled letters.
Casey Connor
2018-04-20 22:44:17 UTC (almost 6 years ago)

'critical error' running luminosity mask script

You said you had edited the script - did you not use the script-fu console and its included help for that ? It's some months since I last had to do that, I'm rusty on the details.

Yeah it was a couple years ago, so it's lost to the fog of memory. :-) I think I was updating an old script to be compatible with the more recent versions of gimp. I think I just edited the text file directly. Anyway, guess I'll dive back in again.

I reported it as a bug instead of just debugging the script because gimp popped up a 'critical error' with the stack trace and requested in the dialog that I file a bug about it... didn't seem like it was just a script error, in other words. Sound appropriate?

Thanks, -c

Pat David
2018-04-20 23:14:25 UTC (almost 6 years ago)

'critical error' running luminosity mask script

I’ll have a look at it when I get a moment. Might just need to update something simple.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:45 PM Casey Connor wrote:

You said you had edited the script - did you not use the script-fu console and its included help for that ? It's some months since I last had to do that, I'm rusty on the details.

Yeah it was a couple years ago, so it's lost to the fog of memory. :-) I think I was updating an old script to be compatible with the more recent versions of gimp. I think I just edited the text file directly. Anyway, guess I'll dive back in again.

I reported it as a bug instead of just debugging the script because gimp popped up a 'critical error' with the stack trace and requested in the dialog that I file a bug about it... didn't seem like it was just a script error, in other words. Sound appropriate?

Thanks, -c

_______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

https://patdavid.net
GPG: 66D1 7CA6 8088 4874 946D  18BD 67C7 6219 89E9 57AC
rich404
2018-04-21 15:12:45 UTC (almost 6 years ago)

'critical error' running luminosity mask script

Yeah it was a couple years ago, so it's lost to the fog of memory. :-) I
think I was updating an old script to be compatible with the more recent
versions of gimp. I think I just edited the text file directly. Anyway,
guess I'll dive back in again.

I reported it as a bug instead of just debugging the script because gimp
popped up a 'critical error' with the stack trace and requested in the dialog that I file a bug about it... didn't seem like it was just a script error, in other words. Sound appropriate?

Thanks, -c

I do not suppose any of you mailing list guys ever even think of looking at the gimpusers forum, after all why should you.

but similar question came up a few days ago

http://www.gimpusers.com/mailmsg.php?89758%40forums.gimpusers.com

The Gimp 2.10 appimage is not the best when it come to adding scripts and plugins, however for once it works.

Just pop the script sg-luminosity-masks29.scm in ~/.config/GIMP-AppImage/2.10/scripts/

looks like this: https://i.imgur.com/5EXnsrb.jpg

Casey Connor
2018-04-21 17:50:06 UTC (almost 6 years ago)

'critical error' running luminosity mask script

Just to follow up -- Michael Natterer has fixed this... turns out the script was working fine but the error dialog was unnecessary. Thanks all!

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795418

-c

On 04/20/2018 04:14 PM, Pat David wrote:

I’ll have a look at it when I get a moment. Might just need to update something simple.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:45 PM Casey Connor > wrote:

> You said you had edited the script - did you not use the script-fu > console and its included help for that ?  It's some months since I > last had to do that, I'm rusty on the details.

Yeah it was a couple years ago, so it's lost to the fog of memory. :-) I
think I was updating an old script to be compatible with the more recent
versions of gimp. I think I just edited the text file directly. Anyway,
guess I'll dive back in again.

I reported it as a bug instead of just debugging the script because gimp
popped up a 'critical error' with the stack trace and requested in the
dialog that I file a bug about it... didn't seem like it was just a script error, in other words. Sound appropriate?

Thanks, -c

_______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership:
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

-- https://patdavid.net
GPG: 66D1 7CA6 8088 4874 946D  18BD 67C7 6219 89E9 57AC

Casey Connor
2018-04-21 22:21:23 UTC (almost 6 years ago)

'critical error' running luminosity mask script

Thanks a bunch, Rich -- that script works without error and much faster, too, and the masks are in the proper order when done.

But it seems a lot less aggressive; meaning, the "LLL" mask still includes much of the image, not just the brightest parts. It's working, just doesn't generate as strong a separation as I would need to make it useful.

If I have time to poke around at it, I will. And if there are any other luminosity mask scripts out there I haven't heard of, I'm all ears! (In my secret dreams I hope that a scripter somewhere will make a fancy exposure-blending mask-making tool...)

Much obliged,

-c

I do not suppose any of you mailing list guys ever even think of looking at the gimpusers forum, after all why should you.

but similar question came up a few days ago

http://www.gimpusers.com/mailmsg.php?89758%40forums.gimpusers.com

The Gimp 2.10 appimage is not the best when it come to adding scripts and plugins, however for once it works.

Just pop the script sg-luminosity-masks29.scm in ~/.config/GIMP-AppImage/2.10/scripts/

looks like this: https://i.imgur.com/5EXnsrb.jpg

Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list
2018-04-21 23:23:13 UTC (almost 6 years ago)

'critical error' running luminosity mask script

On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 05:12:45PM +0200, rich404 wrote:

I do not suppose any of you mailing list guys ever even think of looking at the gimpusers forum, after all why should you.

but similar question came up a few days ago

http://www.gimpusers.com/mailmsg.php?89758%40forums.gimpusers.com

I expect we'll receive that in a few days or weeks, whenever someone has time to approve the 'unsubscribed' posts, but -

The Gimp 2.10 appimage is not the best when it come to adding scripts and plugins, however for once it works.

Just pop the script sg-luminosity-masks29.scm in ~/.config/GIMP-AppImage/2.10/scripts/

looks like this: https://i.imgur.com/5EXnsrb.jpg

You might have that directory, but in my from-source RC2 install my local scripts are read from

~/.config/GIMP/2.10/scripts/

i.e. GIMP not GIMP-AppImage : something different in how your version was built ? I only ask because there will be enough pain from updating old documentation without multiple variants of the directory name.

ĸen

This email was written using 100% recycled letters.
Casey Connor
2018-04-22 04:51:08 UTC (almost 6 years ago)

'critical error' running luminosity mask script

I'm not the qualified person to respond to this, but: my understanding was that App-Image versions use that directory so as not to mess with normal installs, which is exactly how I would hope it would work... e.g. they're supposed to be 'portable' etc. but need to store their user settings somewhere, so... seems reasonable? The CCE uses yet a different directory: GIMP-CCE-AppImage...

Or did you mean something else?

You might have that directory, but in my from-source RC2 install my local scripts are read from

~/.config/GIMP/2.10/scripts/

i.e. GIMP not GIMP-AppImage : something different in how your version was built ? I only ask because there will be enough pain from updating old documentation without multiple variants of the directory name.

ĸen

Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list
2018-04-22 20:29:45 UTC (almost 6 years ago)

'critical error' running luminosity mask script

On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 09:51:08PM -0700, Casey Connor wrote:

I'm not the qualified person to respond to this, but: my understanding was that App-Image versions use that directory so as not to mess with normal installs, which is exactly how I would hope it would work... e.g. they're supposed to be 'portable' etc. but need to store their user settings somewhere, so... seems reasonable? The CCE uses yet a different directory: GIMP-CCE-AppImage...

Or did you mean something else?

No, that is what I meant. When I was fixing my own script yesterday I had to remind myself where non-system scripts lived. The online tutorial mentioned ~/.gimp-2.8/scripts which is clearly out of date.

So, it seems there can be any number of possible directories in ~/.config for 2.10 - hopefully they all start 'GIMP' even if they have a suffix.

ĸen

This email was written using 100% recycled letters.