Sign up now! · Forgot password?
RSS/Atom feed identi.ca Twitter

Poll results

Question: Do you look forward to see a fully 16/32-bit-capable GIMP?

Created at Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:38:11 +0000
Open until Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000

In total, 278 votes has been given:

  • Yes, definitley! This will be really cool. (206 votes)
  • Not really, I'm very fine with only 8-bit-support. I don't need more. (10 votes)
  • 16/32 Bit?!?! What is that supposed to mean? I don't know the advantages. (62 votes)

Vote visualisation

Comments

Post your own comments, questions or hints here. The author and other users will see your posting and can reply to it.

Of course, you can also ask in the chat.

Subscription management

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

User rating

This topic (Do you look forward to see a fully 16/32-bit-capable GIMP?) has been rated 3.0/5.0.

*

As a registered user, you can rate articles and comments, attach files to comments, subscribe to topics and you don't need to solve CAPTCHAs anymore.

*…optional

gpzt member for about 6 years gpzt 13 comments
over 5 years ago

Can hardly wait for it !
Regards,
Gpzt

gpzt member for about 6 years gpzt 13 comments
over 5 years ago

Downloaded and installed Gimp 2.9 portable experimental version (Partha) for Windows 7-64 bits today. Noticed that Siox logo was missing from toolbox. Received a debug message in Gimp output window: mapped'Xtns/Batch Process...' to 'Image>/Filters/Extensions/Batch Process...' Had to restart my PC after error message saying that it was being sent to Microsoft: everything OK now, with 2.8.2 working perfectly. Guess I'll wait for stable version...Regards

JimmyVolatile member for over 5 years JimmyVolatile 7 comments rated this topic with 3/5
over 5 years ago

Hi. How can I respond to the poll? I only see the result, not any options to respond at all.