Sent: 2009-06-29 07:07:51 UTC (over 2 years ago)

From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak

Is bugzilla up-to-date?

permalink

I went to bugzilla, brought up a report, opened the corresponding XML
file, and the bug was fixed. I assume the bug was fixed because there
was a note in the header that stated that the file was changed to
accommodate that particular bug. On the other hand, the bug was still
listed as "not verified" and it had no comments.

I only checked one bug, and at that point I stopped. I did not pursue
this to check dates (bad me).

Is it worth my time to check bugzilla for documentation issues (since I
am working through the documentation)?

I should mention that I am impressed with how good the existing
documentation is.

I noticed that GIMP now supports color profiles... I had absolutely no
idea that this was the case. Very nice. I will need to point GIMP at my
color profile. My Huey works great on Linux!

--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
My Book: http://www.hentzenwerke.com/catalog/oome.htm
Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
See Also: http://documentation.openoffice.org/HOW_TO/index.html

_______________________________________________
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs

Sent: 2009-06-30 14:09:30 UTC (over 2 years ago)

From: Roman Joost

Is bugzilla up-to-date?

permalink

Hi Andrew,

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:07:51AM -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
> I went to bugzilla, brought up a report, opened the corresponding XML
> file, and the bug was fixed. I assume the bug was fixed because there
> was a note in the header that stated that the file was changed to
> accommodate that particular bug. On the other hand, the bug was still
> listed as "not verified" and it had no comments.
>
> I only checked one bug, and at that point I stopped. I did not pursue
> this to check dates (bad me).
Which bug btw?

> Is it worth my time to check bugzilla for documentation issues (since I
> am working through the documentation)?
Sure it is. You should assign the bug to yourself if you are work on
one. I had one clash with Ulf in the past, where he was faster with
fixing and pushing his changes than me :)

> I should mention that I am impressed with how good the existing
> documentation is.
Cheers!

--
Roman Joost
www: http://www.romanofski.de
email: romanofski@gimp.org

_______________________________________________
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs

Sent: 2009-06-30 14:28:21 UTC (over 2 years ago)

From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak

Is bugzilla up-to-date?

permalink

On 06/30/2009 08:09 AM, Roman Joost wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:07:51AM -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
>
>> I went to bugzilla, brought up a report, opened the corresponding XML
>> file, and the bug was fixed. I assume the bug was fixed because there
>> was a note in the header that stated that the file was changed to
>> accommodate that particular bug. On the other hand, the bug was still
>> listed as "not verified" and it had no comments.
>>
>> I only checked one bug, and at that point I stopped. I did not pursue
>> this to check dates (bad me).
>>
> Which bug btw?
>

I think that it was this one:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577170

$ find . -type f -exec grep -i 577170 \{\} --with-filename \;

./dialogs/gradient-editor-dialog.xml: 2009-04-04 j.h: fixed bug #577170

--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
My Book: http://www.hentzenwerke.com/catalog/oome.htm
Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
See Also: http://documentation.openoffice.org/HOW_TO/index.html

_______________________________________________
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs