RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled
  1. Chat
  2. Useful links
  3. Polls

Featured content

gimp git considers all predefined brushes as having 100% hardness

This discussion is connected to the gimp-developer-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

6 of 6 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.
gimp git considers all predefined brushes as having 100% hardness Alexander Rabtchevich 02 Jan 14:22
  gimp git considers all predefined brushes as having 100% hardness Alexandre Prokoudine 03 Jan 18:33
   gimp git considers all predefined brushes as having 100% hardness Hartmut Kuhse 04 Jan 09:51
    gimp git considers all predefined brushes as having 100% hardness Michael Natterer 04 Jan 13:44
     gimp git considers all predefined brushes as having 100% hardness Alexia Death 06 Jan 07:25
   gimp git considers all predefined brushes as having 100% hardness Alexander Rabtchevich 04 Jan 10:28
Alexander Rabtchevich
2015-01-02 14:22:00 UTC (over 9 years ago)

gimp git considers all predefined brushes as having 100% hardness

Hello

Current git considers any built-in brush as a solid one.

With respect, Alexander Rabtchevich

Alexandre Prokoudine
2015-01-03 18:33:36 UTC (over 9 years ago)

gimp git considers all predefined brushes as having 100% hardness

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:

Hello

Current git considers any built-in brush as a solid one.

Solid? What do you mean?

Alex

Hartmut Kuhse
2015-01-04 09:51:12 UTC (over 9 years ago)

gimp git considers all predefined brushes as having 100% hardness

I think, this is related to

Bug 741200 -paint options spacing differs from brush spacing

Hatti

Am 03.01.2015 um 19:33 schrieb Alexandre Prokoudine:

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:

Hello

Current git considers any built-in brush as a solid one.

Solid? What do you mean?

Alex _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list

Alexander Rabtchevich
2015-01-04 10:28:27 UTC (over 9 years ago)

gimp git considers all predefined brushes as having 100% hardness

If you select a predefined round brush with 25% hardness its real hardness will be 100% until you manually change it.

With respect, Alexander Rabtchevich

Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:

Hello

Current git considers any built-in brush as a solid one.

Solid? What do you mean?

Alex _______________________________________________

Michael Natterer
2015-01-04 13:44:16 UTC (over 9 years ago)

gimp git considers all predefined brushes as having 100% hardness

On Sun, 2015-01-04 at 10:51 +0100, Hartmut Kuhse wrote:

I think, this is related to

Bug 741200 -paint options spacing differs from brush spacing

Yes, it's the same issue, it affects not only spacing but also hardness.

--Mitch

Hatti

Am 03.01.2015 um 19:33 schrieb Alexandre Prokoudine:

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:

Hello

Current git considers any built-in brush as a solid one.

Solid? What do you mean?

Alex _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list

_______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list

Alexia Death
2015-01-06 07:25:17 UTC (over 9 years ago)

gimp git considers all predefined brushes as having 100% hardness

There is a patch now attached to the bug that is up for commentary. Feedback welcome.

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:

On Sun, 2015-01-04 at 10:51 +0100, Hartmut Kuhse wrote:

I think, this is related to

Bug 741200 -paint options spacing differs from brush spacing

Yes, it's the same issue, it affects not only spacing but also hardness.

--Mitch

Hatti

Am 03.01.2015 um 19:33 schrieb Alexandre Prokoudine:

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:

Hello

Current git considers any built-in brush as a solid one.

Solid? What do you mean?

Alex _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org List membership:

https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list

List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list

_______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org List membership:

https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list

List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list

_______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org List membership:
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list

--Alexia