Sign up now! · Forgot password?
gimpusers.com RSS feed
58 @ identi.ca
819 @ Twitter

Postscript 64-bit

ForumsFor GIMP developers (read-only) ► Postscript 64-bit

Sent: 2012-02-20 23:29:11 UTC (3 months ago)

From: Partha Bagchi

Postscript 64-bit

Hi Mukund,

Thanks for making it so that gimp build requires one less application
to package! It is working flawlessly in Windows 32-bit. :)

I am having trouble on 64-bit. There is not output and the only error
message I have to give you is:

____________Error Message____________
Opening 'C:\Users\partha\Pictures\Images\PostScript Examples\tiger.eps' failed:

Could not interpret Postscript file
'C:\Users\partha\Pictures\Images\PostScript Examples\tiger.eps'
____________End Error________________

Any suggestions would be most helpful

Thanks!
Partha

Sent: 2012-02-22 13:56:35 UTC (3 months ago)

From: Mukund Sivaraman

Postscript 64-bit

Hi Partha

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:29:11PM -0500, Partha Bagchi wrote:
> Hi Mukund,
>
> Thanks for making it so that gimp build requires one less application
> to package! It is working flawlessly in Windows 32-bit. :)
>
> I am having trouble on 64-bit. There is not output and the only error
> message I have to give you is:
>
> ____________Error Message____________
> Opening 'C:\Users\partha\Pictures\Images\PostScript Examples\tiger.eps' failed:
>
> Could not interpret Postscript file
> 'C:\Users\partha\Pictures\Images\PostScript Examples\tiger.eps'
> ____________End Error________________
>
> Any suggestions would be most helpful

I don't know what this issue might be as it is on Windows and I don't
have a Windows environment handy. Maybe you can talk to ender about
it. Even he will have to bundle Ghostscript in his Windows installer.

Kind regards,

Mukund

Sent: 2012-02-22 23:48:30 UTC (3 months ago)

From: Alexandre Prokoudine

Postscript 64-bit

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Partha Bagchi wrote:
> Hi Mukund,
>
> Thanks for making it so that gimp build requires one less application
> to package! It is working flawlessly in Windows 32-bit. :)
>
> I am having trouble on 64-bit. There is not output and the only error
> message I have to give you is:
>
> ____________Error Message____________
> Opening 'C:\Users\partha\Pictures\Images\PostScript Examples\tiger.eps' failed:
>
> Could not interpret Postscript file
> 'C:\Users\partha\Pictures\Images\PostScript Examples\tiger.eps'
> ____________End Error________________
>
> Any suggestions would be most helpful

Interesting, a 2.6.12 user just reported this:

"Hi! I've found really bad error in 2.6.12 - I can't import pdf files
properly. Only vector elements (e.g. texts) can be opened, raster
images are missing or left as black rectangles. 2.6.11 works fine.
(Win7 64bit)"

Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org

Sent: 2012-02-22 23:51:28 UTC (3 months ago)

From: Mukund Sivaraman

Postscript 64-bit

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 03:48:30AM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Partha Bagchi wrote:
> > Hi Mukund,
> >
> > Thanks for making it so that gimp build requires one less application
> > to package! It is working flawlessly in Windows 32-bit. :)
> >
> > I am having trouble on 64-bit. There is not output and the only error
> > message I have to give you is:
> >
> > ____________Error Message____________
> > Opening 'C:\Users\partha\Pictures\Images\PostScript Examples\tiger.eps' failed:
> >
> > Could not interpret Postscript file
> > 'C:\Users\partha\Pictures\Images\PostScript Examples\tiger.eps'
> > ____________End Error________________
> >
> > Any suggestions would be most helpful
>
> Interesting, a 2.6.12 user just reported this:
>
> "Hi! I've found really bad error in 2.6.12 - I can't import pdf files
> properly. Only vector elements (e.g. texts) can be opened, raster
> images are missing or left as black rectangles. 2.6.11 works fine.
> (Win7 64bit)"

The change Partha mentions is only in the master branch.

Kind regards,

Mukund

Sent: 2012-02-23 00:03:34 UTC (3 months ago)

From: Alexandre Prokoudine

Postscript 64-bit

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:

> The change Partha mentions is only in the master branch.

No! Really? :)

Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org

Sent: 2012-02-26 19:17:21 UTC (3 months ago)

From: Hamilton Fischer

status of gimp 2.8

I don't want to be pushy, but I'm curious about the status of work on gimp 2.8. Just curious.

noobermin

Sent: 2012-02-26 19:28:43 UTC (3 months ago)

From: Alexandre Prokoudine

status of gimp 2.8

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Hamilton Fischer wrote:
> I don't want to be pushy, but I'm curious about the status of work on gimp
> 2.8. Just curious.

It's a work in progress, final stage.

Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org

Sent: 2012-02-27 10:46:45 UTC (3 months ago)

From: Partha Bagchi

Postscript 64-bit

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> Hi Partha
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:29:11PM -0500, Partha Bagchi wrote:
>> Hi Mukund,
>>
>> Thanks for making it so that gimp build requires one less application
>> to package! It is working flawlessly in Windows 32-bit. :)
>>
>> I am having trouble on 64-bit. There is not output and the only error
>> message I have to give you is:
>>
>> ____________Error Message____________
>> Opening 'C:\Users\partha\Pictures\Images\PostScript Examples\tiger.eps' failed:
>>
>> Could not interpret Postscript file
>> 'C:\Users\partha\Pictures\Images\PostScript Examples\tiger.eps'
>> ____________End Error________________
>>
>> Any suggestions would be most helpful
>
> I don't know what this issue might be as it is on Windows and I don't
> have a Windows environment handy.

Sent: 2012-02-27 10:57:39 UTC (3 months ago)

From: Mukund Sivaraman

Postscript 64-bit

Hi Partha

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 05:46:45AM -0500, Partha Bagchi wrote:
> Thanks for you response Mukund. I will continue to investigate by
> isolating the iapi code and running it separately to determine why it
> does not work on 64-bit Windows. Does it work on 64-bit Linux?

Sure it does :)

>
> Finally, Ender, can you help or are you aware of this issue?
>
> Thanks!
> Partha

Kind regards,

Mukund

Sent: 2012-03-03 17:56:10 UTC (2 months ago)

From: Sonic Spuds

status of gimp 2.8

Is there anything that us non-programmers can do to speed the process? (Try
to do a splash screen contest etc.)

-Sonic

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoudine@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Hamilton Fischer wrote:
> > I don't want to be pushy, but I'm curious about the status of work on
> gimp
> > 2.8. Just curious.
>
> It's a work in progress, final stage.
>
> Alexandre Prokoudine
> http://libregraphicsworld.org
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
>

Sent: 2012-03-04 23:25:50 UTC (2 months ago)

From: C55inator

status of gimp 2.8

Also wondering :) I'm an artist who does all work in GIMP, no programming experience though. Is there any way for us designers to help contribute to the development without coding [icons, UI, etc]? Or are donations the best way to help?

On Mar 3, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Sonic Spuds wrote:

> Is there anything that us non-programmers can do to speed the process? (Try to do a splash screen contest etc.)
>
> -Sonic
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Hamilton Fischer wrote:
> > I don't want to be pushy, but I'm curious about the status of work on gimp
> > 2.8. Just curious.
>
> It's a work in progress, final stage.
>
> Alexandre Prokoudine
> http://libregraphicsworld.org
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list

Sent: 2012-03-11 21:37:24 UTC (2 months ago)

From: Partha Bagchi

Postscript 64-bit

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> Hi Partha
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 05:46:45AM -0500, Partha Bagchi wrote:
>> Thanks for you response Mukund. I will continue to investigate by
>> isolating the iapi code and running it separately to determine why it
>> does not work on 64-bit Windows. Does it work on 64-bit Linux?
>
> Sure it does :)
I knew you would say that. :)
>
>>
>> Finally, Ender, can you help or are you aware of this issue?
>>
I didn't see any replies from him here. So perhaps he is busy.
>> Thanks!
>> Partha
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Mukund

Anyway, I made some more progress on this. libgs-8.dll (Ghostscript
8.47) that I am using is built with libtiff 4.0.1. This was the main
culprit. When I use tiff 4.0.1, Gimp will no longer open tiff files
complaining that it was unable to read the header. This is true (for
me) on both Windows 32 and 64 bit. So, I rebuilt tiff 3.9.4, which
created libtiff-3.dll and Gimp can open tiff files now. However, it
breaks Ghostscript and so I reverted your changes and went back to
loading an external program to load PS files.

I wonder why tiff 4.0.1 is failing on my builds. Has anyone tested
tiff 4.0.1 on a Linux machine to confirm this?

Thanks for all your help Mukund. It really helped me with this problem.

Partha

Sent: 2012-03-11 22:02:19 UTC (2 months ago)

From: Jernej Simončič

Postscript 64-bit

On Sunday, March 11, 2012, 22:37:24, Partha Bagchi wrote:

>>> Finally, Ender, can you help or are you aware of this issue?
> I didn't see any replies from him here. So perhaps he is busy.

I haven't tried building with ghostscript yet.

> I wonder why tiff 4.0.1 is failing on my builds. Has anyone tested
> tiff 4.0.1 on a Linux machine to confirm this?

This seems to be a Windows-specific problem. I've got GIMP 2.6.12
built against libtiff-5.dll (ver. 4.0.0), and it doesn't load any tiff
files, while GIMP 2.6.12 on Linux built against libtiff.so.5.0.5
(version 4.0.0-r1, gentoo) works fine.

< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ >

That which we call sin in others is experiment for us.
-- Emerson's Insight

Sent: 2012-03-11 22:12:59 UTC (2 months ago)

From: Partha Bagchi

Postscript 64-bit

2012/3/11 Jernej Simončič :
> On Sunday, March 11, 2012, 22:37:24, Partha Bagchi wrote:
>
>>>> Finally, Ender, can you help or are you aware of this issue?
>> I didn't see any replies from him here. So perhaps he is busy.
>
> I haven't tried building with ghostscript yet.

>
>> I wonder why tiff 4.0.1 is failing on my builds. Has anyone tested
>> tiff 4.0.1 on a Linux machine to confirm this?
>
> This seems to be a Windows-specific problem. I've got GIMP 2.6.12
> built against libtiff-5.dll (ver. 4.0.0), and it doesn't load any tiff
> files, while GIMP 2.6.12 on Linux built against libtiff.so.5.0.5
> (version 4.0.0-r1, gentoo) works fine.
>
Thanks for the confirmation, Ender. Looks like I will stay with 3.9.4
then which is working fine on Windows (64 or 32). Gimp will not load a
tiff file with 4.0.1 on Windows.

Partha

> --
> < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ >
>
> That which we call sin in others is experiment for us.
>       -- Emerson's Insight
>
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list