Sent: 2010-07-18 07:39:58 UTC (over 1 year ago)

From: Stuart Axon

Move to gObject introspection?

permalink

Maybe using GObject introspection would be an easier way of doing the bindings
for Gegl, as you only have to do it once to get bindings for quite a few
languages.

S++

_______________________________________________
Gegl-developer mailing list
Gegl-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer

Sent: 2010-07-18 17:40:35 UTC (over 1 year ago)

From: Martin Nordholts

Move to gObject introspection?

permalink

On 07/18/2010 07:39 AM, Stuart Axon wrote:
> Maybe using GObject introspection would be an easier way of doing the bindings
> for Gegl, as you only have to do it once to get bindings for quite a few
> languages.

We should definitely do that, yes. Right now GEGL has a bit of a custom
documentation syntax, so we would probably have to adjust it a bit to be
GObject introspection compatible. I haven't looked it up in detail though.

/ Martin

--

My GIMP Blog:
http://www.chromecode.com/
"Automatic tab style and removed tab title bar"
_______________________________________________
Gegl-developer mailing list
Gegl-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer